Posts Tagged ‘money’

TSX: MMY
FSE: D7Q1
Mines & Properties
Properties and Resources
Selinsing Property
Buffalo Reef
Famehub Properties
Murchison Gold Project
Mengapur Project
Malaysia
Malaysia’s Geology
Mines
Photo Gallery
Show printable version of ‘Malaysia’s Geology’ in a New Window
Malaysia
Malaysia’s Geology
Malaysia’s Natural Resources

Malaysia has abundant natural resources in agriculture, forestry and minerals. In terms of agriculture, Malaysia is one of the top exporters of natural rubber and palm oil, which together with sawn logs and sawn timber, cocoa, pepper, pineapples and tobacco dominate the growth in the sector.

Tin and petroleum are the two main mineral resources that are of major significance in the Malaysian economy. Malaysia was once the world’s largest producer of tin until the collapse of the tin market in the early 1980s. Petroleum and natural gas took over as the mainstays of the mineral extraction sector, as the tin production declined. Apart from tin, Malaysia is also a producer of copper, bauxite, gold and ilmenite.

Malaysia’s Central Gold Belt hosts the majority of peninsular Malaysia’s gold occurrences, including the Raub, Selinsing and Penjom gold mines in the state of Pahang. The Central Gold Belt runs up the spine of the Malaysian peninsula into Thailand and hosts a number of structurally controlled quartz veins in a sequence of old and folded slates.

A 2001 World Gold Council (WGC) report mentions Malaysia as one of the countries that could benefit significantly from an increase in gold mining activity. The WGC is an international organization formed by leading gold mining companies from around the world to monitor and analyze developments in the gold market and to encourage demand for gold.

Malaysia has long been a source of gold derived by artisanal miners. Serious artisanal gold mining by the local native artisanal gold miners began in the late 1890s. In Malaysia, gold is principally associated with gold belts or reefs as they are referred to in Malaysia. These gold belts were created along tensional fracture or shear zones along subduction zones.

The dilated zones were subsequently filled with hydrothermal quartz veins. These gold belts vary in length and in width from 10 km to 20 km extending along the entire backbone of Peninsular Malaysia and into Thailand, Cambodia and Laos to the north. Individual quartz veins within the gold belts vary from a few centimetres to 30 metres in width.

The individual veins consist primarily of quartz and can contain free gold, pyrite, arsenopyrite, stibnite, graphite and galena. Disseminated sulphides can occur in the wallrocks and that the auriferous mineralization can be quite extensive. Much of the gold in the Malaysian gold belt lies along lateral fracture or shear zones at the contacts of the upper series of metavolcanics and the lower series of metasediments within the quartz vein structures.

The deposit type for this area is the mesothermal lode gold deposit model seen worldwide, such as the Bendigo-Ballarat district in Australia, the Mother Lode district in California and the Meguma district in Canada. These deposits are often characterized by considerable vertical extent and high grade ore shoots. Another deposit that contains similarities would be the world class Ashanti Goldfields Mining Ltd. – Obuasi Mine in Ghana which is a vein gold deposit that has been operating for several hundred years.

Medium of exchange
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Definition[edit]
Money is the generally accepted medium of exchange and its most important and essential function is that it is a ‘measure of value’…[1][2] Hifzur Rab has shown that the market measures or sets the real value of various goods and services using the medium of exchange/money as unit of measure i.e., standard or the yard stick of measurement of wealth. There is no other alternative to the mechanism used by the market to set, determine, or measure the value of various goods and services. Just determination of prices is an essential condition for justice in exchange, efficient allocation of resources, economic growth welfare and justice.Money helps us in gaining power of buying. Thus, this is the most important and essential function of money. To be widely acceptable, a medium of exchange should have a relatively stable purchasing power (real value) and therefore it should possess the following characteristics:

Value common assets
Constant utility
Low cost of preservation
Transportability
Divisibility
High market value in relation to volume and weight
Recognisability
Resistance to counterfeiting

To serve as a measure of value, a medium of exchange, be it a good or signal, needs to have constant inherent value of its own or it must be firmly linked to a definite basket of goods and services. It should have constant intrinsic value and stable purchasing power. Gold was long popular as a medium of exchange and store of value because it was inert, was convenient to move due to even small amounts of gold having considerable value, had a constant value due to its special physical and chemical properties, and was cherished by men.

Critics of the prevailing system of fiat money argue that fiat money is the root cause of the continuum of economic crises, since it leads to the dominance of fraud, corruption, and manipulation precisely because it does not satisfy the criteria for a medium of exchange cited above. Specifically, prevailing fiat money is free float and depending upon its supply market finds or sets a value to it that continues to change as the supply of money is changed with respect to the economy’s demand. Increasing free floating money supply with respect to needs of the economy reduces the quantity of the basket of the goods and services to which it is linked by the market and that provides it purchasing power. Thus it is not a unit or standard measure of wealth and its manipulation impedes the market mechanism by that it sets/determine just prices. That leads us to a situation where no value-related economic data is just or reliable.[3][4] On the other hand, Chartalists claim that the ability to manipulate the value of fiat money is an advantage, in that fiscal stimulus is more easily available in times of economic crisis.

Requisites needed[edit]
Although the unit of account must be in some way related to the medium of exchange in use, e.g. coinage should be in denominations of that unit making accounting much easier to perform, it has often been the case that media of exchange have no natural relationship to that unit, and must be ‘minted’ or in some way marked as having that value. Also there may be variances in quality of the underlying good which may not have fully agreed commodity grading. The difference between the two functions becomes obvious when one considers the fact that coins were very often ‘shaved’, precious metal removed from them, leaving them still useful as an identifiable coin in the marketplace, for a certain number of units in trade, but which no longer had the quantity of metal supplied by the coin’s minter. It was observed as early as Oresme, Copernicus and then in 1558 by Sir Thomas Gresham, that bad money drives out good in any marketplace (Gresham’s Law states “Where legal tender laws exist, bad money drives out good money”). A more precise definition is this: “A currency that is artificially overvalued by law will drive out of circulation a currency that is artificially undervalued by that law.” Gresham’s law is therefore a specific application of the general law of price controls. A common explanation is that people will always keep the less adultered, less clipped, sweated, less filed, less trimmed coin, and offer the other in the marketplace for the full units for which it is marked. It is inevitably the bad coins proffered, good ones retained.

The fact that a bank or mint has always been able to generate a medium of exchange marked for more units than it is worth as a store of value, is the basis of banking.[dubious – discuss] Central banking is based on the principle that no medium needs more than the guarantee of the state that it can be redeemed for payment of debt as “legal tender” – thus, all money equally backed by the state is good money, within that state.[dubious – discuss] As long as that state produces anything of value to others, its medium of exchange has some value, and its currency may also be useful as a standard of deferred payment among others, even those who never deal with that state directly in foreign exchange.

Of all functions of money, the medium of exchange function has historically been the most problematic because of counterfeiting, the systematic and deliberate creation of bad money with no authorization to do so, leading to the driving out of the good money entirely.

Other functions rely not on recognition of some token or weight of metal in a marketplace, where time to detect any counterfeit is limited and benefits for successful passing-off are high, but on more stable long term social contracts: one cannot easily force a whole society to accept a different standard of deferred payment, require even small groups of people to uphold a floor price for a store of value, still less to re-price everything and rewrite all accounts to a unit of account (the most stable function). Thus it tends to be the medium of exchange function that constrains what can be used as a form of financial capital.

It was once common in the United States to widely accept a check (cheque) as a medium of exchange, several parties endorsing it perhaps multiple times before it would eventually be deposited for its value in units of account, and thus redeemed. This practice became less common as it was exploited by forgers and led to a domino effect of bounced checks – a forerunner of the kind of fragility that electronic systems would eventually bring.

In the age of electronic money it was, and remains, common to use very long strings of difficult-to-reproduce numbers, generated by encryption methods, to authenticate transactions and commitments as having come from trusted parties. Thus the medium of exchange function has become wholly a part of the marketplace and its signals, and is utterly integrated with the unit of account function, so that, given the integrity of the public key system on which these are based, they become to that degree inseparable. This has clear advantages – counterfeiting is difficult or impossible unless the whole system is compromised, say by a new factoring algorithm. But at that point, the entire system is broken and the whole infrastructure is obsolete – new keys must be re-generated and the new system will also depend on some assumptions about difficulty of factoring.

Due to this inherent fragility, which is even more profound with electronic voting, some economists argue that units of account should not ever be abstracted or confused with the nominal units or tokens used in exchange. A medium is just that, a medium, and should not be confused for the message.[dubious – discuss]

Ramli read this article and wish to share with all of you based on US experience.

More Americans delaying retirement until their 80s

By Blake Ellis @CNNMoney October 23, 2012: 8:01 AM ET

 

 

Nearly three-quarters of those who plan to work into their 80’s say they fear their employer won’t want them working when they’re that old.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — As they struggle to save for retirement, a growing number of middle-class Americans plan to postpone their golden years until they are in their 80’s.

Nearly one-third, or 30%, now plan to work until they are 80 or older — up from 25% a year ago, according to a Wells Fargo survey of 1,000 adults with income less than $100,000.

Ultimate Guide to Retirement

 

“It is so tough for Americans to save for retirement that the answer seems to be to work longer,” said Joe Ready, director of Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement and Trust.

Overall, 70% of respondents plan to work during retirement, many of whom plan to do so because they simply won’t be able to afford to retire full time.

But working well into your 70’s, 80’s or even 90’s, isn’t always realistic,said Ready. Nearly three-quarters of those who plan to work into their 80’s say their employer won’t want them working when they’re that old, for example. Other roadblocks, like health issues, could arise as well.

Those who are unable to work as long as they intend could therefore face a very grim reality. In fact, more than one-third of Americans could wind up living at or near poverty in retirement, the survey found.

Related: How they’re getting ready for retirement

About 34% of middle-class Americans expect their retirement income to be 50% or less of their current annual income. Given Census Bureau data showing a median household income of $50,054 in 2011, this would mean living on roughly $25,000 or less per year — which is near the poverty linefor a family of four, the report found.

Retirement saving on the backburner: Half of middle-class Americans report that their most pressing financial concern is paying their monthly bills, up from 37% a year ago. Saving for retirement is second on the list.

Respondents also said that home remodeling and vacation planning have taken precedence over saving for retirement over the past 12 months.

Related: Countdown to retirement: 10 years to go

As a result, there’s a huge disparity between what people need and what they have saved. While respondents said they will need a median of $300,000 in total savings to support themselves in retirement, the average amount saved is only $25,000.

Overall, 53% of Americans say they don’t know whether they will have enough saved for retirement — up from 42% last year.

Despite falling short of expectations, half of respondents said they consider themselves responsible for funding their own retirement through saving and investing. Another 27% said they will fund their retirement through their employer’s plan, while 24% said they will mainly rely on Social Security benefits.

Related: How to make your retirement savings last

Aside from putting daily bills and current financial needs ahead of retirement saving, many Americans aren’t in the position to adequately fund their own retirement because they have no idea how much to save. Only 22% say they have calculated the amount of money needed for retirement — whereas 75% of respondents said they guess. (Find out how much you will need for retirement).

And guessing can be dangerous. While respondents estimated that the median cost of their out-of-pocket healthcare in retirement will be $47,000, for example, industry estimates put those costs closer to $260,000 or more, according to the report.

“People tell us that retirement preparation should be on their shoulders but they are grappling with financial pressures each day,” said Laurie Nordquist, director of Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement and Trust. “As a result, retirement has become a guessing game.”

 

Now in this few months of april,may and maybe june also-many Malaysians get “money surprises” and their wallets are being filled with “maybe” election money pledges and everyone is happy-but until when?

When the bag of money is plenty or fulled we can give out money or make money pledges but when these bags become empty then all these money flows will suddenly stopped and the Rakyat will be caught and live in hardships because they only weree taught of getting fish from some people but not learn to catch fish in lakes,rivers or seas so they can eat all the time!

Sure,its good to have money or lots of money to some (greedy ones) but where does these money come from?

Lets be real,pragmatic and think of Malaysia’s future more than all these quick gains or trends of giving out easy money!By the way,whose money are these?surely its the govt money and if they are used improperly,extravagantly and with poor planning then after the 13MGE we will face more debt crisis and live in hardships or worst still Malaysia will become a bankrupt country with lots of politicians but no improvement and better economy of Malaysia.Gaya ada tapi kerja tiada dan duit tiada?

Lets study and be wise always….

Contact Ramli at hp:+6019-2537165 or email: ramlipromoter@yahoo.com

WE hear many times about innocent people being cheated by many CROOKS in many forms like:

  • empty promises
  • false claims
  • loss of deposits / full sum of meny paid already
  • stolen productst
  • illegal claims
  • wrong properties / rights ownerships
  • no such products/services
  • short falls of promised returns of profits
  • and many more

Time and time again we are cheated by these crooks due to our weaknesses like:

  • poor knowledge of the deal/s
  • poor knowledge of the products or services offered
  • greed
  • in hurry to get rich
  • easily being “sweet talk”
  • too trusting
  • never make a double check on the person/s or companies involved
  • never do a proper analysis on the project
  • never ask for an expert opinion
  • keep secret of the deal/s from others
  • and any others

So,at the end of the day,we get cheated and lose our money,investments and face value!

Many women also being cheated by these so called casanovas or “handsome men” with their promises of marraige  after parting away with their harde earned money and given to these crooks who when receiving this money all “gone away” and never see their faces again!

As some people say in the Underworld,a deal is good enough with a handshake no need contracts,legal presence etc..because the moment you dont honour your word or handshake then it is right for the side being cheated take action by “ending” your life or anyone else involved!Thats the best way -my word is my bond” as they say like your marriage vows in front of the priest.

So we need to learn this subject of having a good negotiation and genuine deal all the time becuase the world nowadays are filled with crooks,bad people with bad hearts and intentions.A handshake is no more genuine and people make lenghty contracts and let the lawyers make lots of money from these legal deals BUT even with contracts people still cheat and steal your money?

Let’s have a FOOL PROOF way of making deals where we zerorised any mistakes or bad deals.Anyone with some good proven ways or ideas?

Contact Ramli at hp:+6019-2537165 or email: ramlipromoter@yahoo.com

 

Let’s watch these videos on what Leaders’ thoughts about Leading the Right Ways for the 21st Century. (ref;YouTube)

Earning a BIG Salary like PM of Singapore is Great BUT like all Great Leaders maybe Money is not that so important BUT the service to humanity in terms of unleashing people’s talents,making the world or workplace a better place,happy people doing their work with passion and pride and all other good things or values….

Lets ensure our Leaders big or small in 2012 will make this world a great place and increase her wealth and improve people’s lives all the time…

Riba’ or Usury must be stopped and eliminated to help save the world from manipulations,miseries and all those debts crisis of the minimal and gagantuan sizes!

Why pay money unnecessarily and without any strong basis of shared risks and investments.We pay due to the Riba’ or Interest based system created by Humans and not that is allowable or directed by Allah SWT (God Almighty) as revealed in the Quran.

When humans do not listen or take heed (obey) Allah’s SWT Commands then be ready to face the wraths or punishments from Allah SWT.

Many corporations and Governments (countries) now are going Bankcrupts or Badly Debts Ridden!Why?

The World Financial System and Economics have all been designed to allow Riba’ or Usury to flourish and “suck” all the hard earned money to those “satanly” operators of Riba’ or Usury.

Lots of Money are “gone away” and borrowers now have to service their interests charged by their lenders and they “feeled the pained” just servicing the interests not yet paying the principal borrowed!

“GET RID OF RIBA’ OR USURY” should be the revolutionary call on all Financial Capitals of the world just like what they had recently with the theme of “down with wall street” or whatever was rallied upon!

Riba’s is HARAM especially in Islamic Financial System and the faster we make Riba’ illegal or haram the BETTER THE WORLD AND MORE PEACEFUL THE WORLD WILL BECOME.INSHALLAH!

contact Ramli at hp:+6019-2537165 or emailed: ramlipromoter@yahoo.com   for your comments and suggestions to get rid of Riba’ in our lives forever!

List of wealthiest historical figures

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The list of the wealthiest historical figures is an attempt to gather and compare the net worths and fortunes of historical figures against one another. Inflation and other factors devalue currency over time and economies of different regions and time periods valued goods and other commodities at different prices, making it difficult to accurately compare fortunes from different decades, centuries and especially millennia. Also, because several individuals and families never had their financial records revealed publicly, nor had any contemporary estimates of their worth, several persons may be noticeably missing from the list due to a lack of written accounts of their wealth. Some of the wealth estimated includes stock in companies, the value of which is always changing.

This list includes both nominal and real wealth. The nominal value of a person’s net worth reflects the price in that person’s time, without adjustments for inflation or other factors. The realvalue of a person’s net worth reflects an attempt to adjust a fortune’s worth against economic factors that usually devalue a currency, and thus reflect the buying power of that wealth as a stable figure comparable across historical periods.

Historical figures and their wealth

Historical figures often attested to be of great riches, presented in alphabetical order.

Alan Rufus

A companion of William the Conqueror during the Norman invasion of Britain, Alan Rufus, who is also known as Alain le Roux or Alan the Red, received some 250,000 acres (1,000 km2) in land grants as a reward for his allegiance. His property stretched throughout Yorkshire, Norfolk, Suffolk, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire and London, totaling some £11,000 by the time of his death in 1093. This would make Alan Rufus the wealthiest Briton in all the history of the British Isles. His fortune was estimated to be equivalent to £81.33 billion, or roughly US$162.74 billion, in 2007.[1]

Mir Osman Ali Khan

Of the seven Nizams who governed Hyderabad StateIndia from 1720 to 1948, the richest was the last, Mir Osman Ali Khan, who was regarded as the wealthiest man on earth – his portrait graced the cover of Time magazine. As recently as 2008 he was rated fifth highest on the Forbes All-Time Wealthiest List (Bill Gates ranks 20th). He had his own mint, printing his own currency, the Hyderabadi rupee, and a vast private treasury. Its coffers were said to contain £100m in gold and silver bullion, and a further £400m of jewels. Among them was the fabulously rare Jacob Diamond, valued at some £60m today, and used by the Nizam as a paperweight. There were pearls, too – enough to pave Piccadilly – hundreds of race horses, thousands of uniforms, tonnes of royal regalia and Rolls-Royces by the dozen.[2]

De’ Medici

The de’ Medici family of Florence is one of the most illustrious noble families in European history, and were the hereditary holders of the titles of Grand Duke of Tuscany, Duke of Florence and Duke of Urbino, and married into still more. Other family members held singularly prominent positions, namely Pope Clement VIIPope Leo XIppolito Cardinale de’ Medici, Catherine de Medici, Queen of France, wife of Henri II- who had an equally famous mistress in Diane de Poitiers (who was distantly related to Catherine) and Marie de’ Medici, Queen of France and of Navarre.

Giovanni di Bicci de’ Medici founded the family’s bank and supported the return of the papacy to Rome, which occurred in 1410. He was rewarded for his efforts with the position of personal banker to the papacy, several tax contracts and alum mines, all of which firmly established both the family’s fortune and political influence. His son Cosimo would expand the bank, allowing the family fortune to grow to 122,669 Florin by 1457. Cosimo’s influence had become so great that he acted as de facto ruler of Florence despite holding no elected office. However by 1481, city tax records show that the family fortune had plummeted to 57,930 Florin under the direction of Lorenzo, who made for a better politician and diplomat than banker.[3]

Jacob Fugger

Jacob Fugger (German: Jakob Fugger) (6 March 1459 – 30 December 1525), sometimes known as Jacob Fugger the Rich, was a German banker and a member of the Fugger banking family of Germany. His nephew was the wealthy banker, Anton Fugger to whom he bequeathed his wealth upon his death.

Marcus Licinius Crassus

Marcus Licinius Crassus is held to be the wealthiest man in Roman history as he had a personal net worth equal to the treasury of Rome.[4] When Crassus was killed in Syria, he was beheaded and molten gold was poured into his mouth to quench his insatiable greed.

One of the leading politicians of Rome in his day, Marcus Licinius Crassus, along with Gaius Julius Caesar and Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, comprised the First Triumvirate. Crassus, born into a wealthy political family, inherited a fortune of 7 million sesterces after the death of his father in 87 BC. Political rivalries eventually led to the state seizing Crassus’s wealth. After several years of exile, Lucius Cornelius Sulla regained a position of power in Rome, and Crassus as a loyal and valued supporter found himself in charge of Sulla’s proscriptions. In such a position, Crassus was able to rebuild his family fortune by seizing the property of executed criminals for himself, and there is evidence that shows Crassus sometimes executed innocent individuals simply to obtain their vast estates and wealth.[4]

Crassus also expanded his wealth by trading in slaves and by purchasing whole neighborhoods of Rome as they burned at drastically below market value. At the time, Rome had no formal way of battling fires and they usually were left to burn themselves out, which meant several estates and fortunes were lost in the process. Crassus employed a firefighting brigade of some five hundred men and, after he negotiated the purchase of the burning building and the surrounding estates in danger, the brigade would collapse the home that was ablaze to extinguish the fire before it could spread.

Crassus was known in Rome as Dives, meaning “The Rich” or “Moneybags”. Plutarch describes how Crassus’s relationship with a Vestal Virgin came into question at one point, for which the punishment was death. Crassus was acquitted after claiming that he merely courted the woman in an attempt to acquire her villa at below market cost and that carnal lusts never came to mind. Wishing to gain both political and military fame during the slave uprisings led by Spartacus, Crassus offered to equip, train, and lead two new legions of soldiers into battle at his own expense in an impressive show of personal wealth. In 53 BC, while again attempting military fame, Crassus was killed during a parley with a Parthian general; Lucius Cassius Dio tells that he thereupon had molten gold poured into his mouth to satiate his unyielding thirst for wealth.

It is believed that Crassus expanded his personal fortune to a remarkable 170 million sesterces, while Pliny the Elder surmised his fortune to be valued even higher, at 200 million sesterces. This would place Crassus’s net worth equal to the total annual budget of the Roman treasury. He has been considered the wealthiest man in history,[4] though this claim has been disputed.[5]

Musa I

A depiction of Mansa Musa holding a gold nugget, from the Catalan Atlas.

Musa I, Mansa of Mali, more commonly referred to simply as Mansa Musa, ascended to the throne of the wealthy Mali Empire in 1312. The emperors were fairly obscure figures outside of Western Africa, but Musa’s religious Hajj in 1324 would bring great attention to the wealth and extravagance of his lands. The retinue that Musa traveled with included 60,000 men, in addition to 12,000 slaves, 500 of which marched before the mansa dressed in silken robes and golden staffs. There were 80 camels in the train that are said to have carried anywhere from 50 to 300 pounds each of gold dust. This entire entourage could be evaluated in terms of today, more than US$400 billion. Musa spent so much gold, particularly in Egypt, that the price of the rare metal was devalued and caused the economy of that nation to be devastated for years. Mansa Musa was reportedly quite pious and very generous to the common people upon his Hajj, such that the citizens of Cairo, Mecca and Baghdad told tales of his visit for generations.[6][7]

Nikolai Alexandrovich Romanov

Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, born in 1868 as Nikolai Alexandrovich into the House of Romanov, was the emperor of the Russian Empire from 1894 until the February Revolution of 1917. Around age 48 (in 1916) his wealth was valued at up to US$ 881 million, which equals US$290.7 billion in today’s money. He is seen as the wealthiest monarch and head of state in history and further as the wealthiest saint as the Russian Orthodox Church declared him, his wife and his children martyrs after being murdered in 1918 by the Bolsheviks.

Rothschilds

The wealth of the Rothschild family at its height during the mid-19th century has been estimated in today’s terms in the hundreds of billions, or even in the trillions, of dollars.[8][8][9][10]

Somozas

 

Anastasio Somoza Debayleand his wife Hope Portocarrerostrolling on grounds of their home.

The wealth of the Somoza family (the political dynasty who ruled Nicaragua), was the largest in Latin America for decades. According to the Cuban magazine: Bohemia, Anastasio Somoza García was on the top ten World’s Richest Men before 1956.

His assets are said to have included 55 percent of the nation’s arable land, 51 cattle ranches, 46 coffee plantations, extensive real estate in Managua, including luxury villas in United States and The Bahamas, and interests in various business ventures. By the time of his assassination, the senior Somoza’s wealth was an estimated $400 million. The Somoza fortune grew as other family members succeeded each other in power. In 1978, their wealth was calculated at some $1 billion to $5 billion.

Anastasio Somoza Debayle contributed a million dollars to the Nixon campaign in 1972, according to a Central America foreign minister who traveled to Washington, DC with Somoza’s mother; Salvadora DeBayle de Somoza. She had asked the minister what his country was contributing to the campaign. When the foreign minister said “nothing”, Salvadora rebuked him “You people are so hopeless, we are giving a million and, as head of the family, I’m taking it up to him”.

Legendary wealth

As records are lost and fortunes often never fully tallied, sometimes only vague stories and grandiose legends are left as witnesses to the treasures held by individuals past. These tales are often believed to be fanciful or exaggerated, and some have even been discredited with new discoveries and evidence. Nevertheless, the fortunes were surely impressive to have remained in the popular conscious through the ages, even if only as legend.

Croesus

Croesus was a king of Lydia in the sixth century BC. His name in Greek and Persian cultures became a synonym for a wealthy man. In English, expressions such as “rich as Croesus” or “richer than Croesus” are used to indicate great wealth. Croesus himself is often credited with the invention of the first formalized currency systems and coinage.

Mausolus

The wealth that was for a long time attributed to Mausolus was more romantic legend than fact. The misconception of his wealth centred around the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus, a great tomb constructed by the king for himself and his wife that was considered a “Wonder of the World” by Greek historians and writers. It survived into the fifteenth century until it was finally destroyed by earthquakes. Afterward, the carved stones and sculptures strewn across the landscape caused writers of the Renaissance to tell tales of the wealth of a king who could afford such beautiful artistry in such great numbers. Much of the remains of the tomb were either plundered for their sculpture or used as an artificial quarry from which castles and fortifications were built over the succeeding centuries.

Yet, discoveries during excavations of the region show that the tomb’s construction either directly bankrupted the treasury, or indirectly lead to the downfall of the kingdom, as high taxation and strain on resources led to political instability, which eventually emboldened neighboring states to invade the weakened kingdom. Many of the artisans and craftsman that were initially hired to construct the tomb continued to work without pay after the kingdom had been bankrupted, working solely for the glory and renown of their efforts.

American entrepreneurs

American entrepreneurs have often amassed the largest nominal fortunes in history. However, due to the effect of inflation, many of these fortunes have actually accumulated smaller real value than some historical figures.

John D. Rockefeller

 

Rockefeller depicted as an emperor of oil and railroad in a contemporary satirical cartoon.

On 29 September 1916, John D. Rockefeller became the first man to ever reach a nominal personal fortune of US$1 billion. Rockefeller amassed his fortune from the Standard Oil company, of which he was a founder, chairman and major shareholder. By the time of his death in 1937, estimates place his net worth in the range of US$392 billion to US$663.4 billion in adjusted dollars for the late 2000s, and it is estimated that his personal fortune was equal to 1.53% of the total U.S. economy in his day. When considering the real value of his wealth, Rockefeller is widely held to be the wealthiest American in the history of the United States.[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]

Cornelius Vanderbilt

Cornelius Vanderbilt gained his fortune from shipping and railroad. His net worth of US$105 million in 1877 was equal to 1.15% of the U.S. economy in his day. With a real value estimated somewhere between US$143 billion and US$178.4 billion adjusted for the late 2000s, Vanderbilt is the second wealthiest American in the history of the country.[12][13][18]

Henry Ford

Henry Ford was an American automotive engineer, entrepreneur, and founder of the Ford Motor Company. Through his designing of the Model T Fordand the assembly line means of rapid production, he was able to lower the base price of his product in order to be reach a wider market. His highest earnings are recorded at age 57 and he died at the age of 83 in 1947 at a net worth of US$188.1 billion (Inflated value in 2008)

Andrew Carnegie

Andrew Carnegie was born in Dunfermline, Scotland before emigrating to the US. Founder of the Carnegie Steel Company, which was the most extensive integrated iron and steel operations in the United States, Carnegie merged his company into U.S. Steel and sold his share for US$492 million in 1901. Capitalized at US$1.4 billion at the time, U.S. Steel was the first billion dollar company in the world. In his final years, Carnegie’s net worth was US$475 million, but by the time of his death in 1919 he had donated most of his wealth to charities and other philanthropic endeavors and had only US$30 million left to his personal fortune. Carnegie’s hundreds of millions accounted for about 0.60% of the U.S. economy and has a real value estimated at anywhere from US$75 billion to US$297.8 billion adjusted for the late 2000s.[11][12][13][18]

John Jacob Astor

After immigrating to the United States, John Jacob Astor began trading in furs and later in real estate and opium. By 1800 his nominal wealth was some US$250,000, and by the time of his death in 1848 his fortune had grown to US$20 million. Equal to 0.93% of the national GDP, Astor has a real wealth estimated at some US$116 billion when adjusted for the late 2000s.[11][12][13][18]

Bill Gates

Bill Gates has singularly amassed the largest nominal fortune in all of history through his computer technology corporation Microsoft, peaking at US$101 billion in 1999.[5] By 2007, his net worth had dropped to US$82 billion, and by 2011 his worth was valued at US$56 billion. Gates donates the majority of his wealth to charity. In terms of real value, Gates is likely one of the ten wealthiest Americans in history.[11] He has been placed in the top 10 wealthiest people of all time.[5]

Money is POWER!

Who said that?

Ramli think KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!

Business Tycoons or even Underworld Bosses have lots of money stashed in Banks,Off Shore Heavens,in lonely islands under the grounds,in their private vaults,by their trusted proxies and what have YOU?

Money can buy anything in this world?Be it people like CEOs,Political Leaders and men or women in the streets?

BUT when you talk this to Leaders of Islam like Prophet Muhammad pbuh,his 4 Pious Caliphs,Sahabats,Tabiin,TabiinTabiin then be careful because in Islam Money is just a vehicle to get things done BUT not to corrupt people or do sinful acts that Islam Prohibits 100%.

So,there is no hiding needed by Leaders of Islam because they are always CLOSE TO THE PEOPLE OR UMMAH.

They are always ready to Jihad in the Name of Allah and Muhammad pbuh.

To die for the sake of Allah SWT is the best and noble thing to do for a Muslim because Jannah awaits all those who truly Jihad for Islam not hypocrites or show off then the Hellfire awaits those who become hypocrites or show offs.

Why Business Tycoons (some of them) hide from the public views or eyes?

Why do Underworld Bosses also hide from the Public views and eyes?

Are they the same persons or what?

Are so fed up..just wrote some texts here and they are gone…why this notebook behave such?

Ok,so maybe its best to write a book on this subject later on…..

Will continue again….

hope this is a starter to write more on this important subject….

contact Ramli for assistance like financial support and sponsorship…+6019-2537165 or ramlipromoter@yahoo.com

 

The recent Malaysian Business Magazine reported that Datuk Mohd Nazir Razak earned about RM 12 Million as his Director’s Fees for 2010 at CIMB Holdings and Datuk Seri Abdul Wahid about RM 4 Million as CEO/President of Maybank.

Please do read the magazine because its good to know how much Top Executives now earned or can earned in Malaysia!

So,when you earned more than a Million RM per month what then is your savings amount per month less all your expenses?

Is it 50% or less you can saved?

So,it is true to say that Datuk Mohd Nazir Razak maybe be able to become a Billionaire when he reached the age of 55 or 60 if he is still a wage earner?Can he achieved that feat just by savings + investments?

Maybe he must follow the footsteps of Tan Sri Tony Fernandes by being an Entrepreneur and own a business where profits can be plenty and the Road to Great Wealth ( as Billionaire ) is more assured and not dependable on your paychecks and perks!

So,is it easy to earn RM 1 Million a month in Malaysia?What to do?

Malaysians are always been encouraged to borrow money and not to save money,why?

So credit cards,personal loans all become popular and the element of RIBA’ or Usury become dominant and people lifes are filled with riba’ and interests servicing.Many people also become bankrupts as a result of too much loan defaults and borrowings!Who to blame?

So earning more can also lead to requests for “under table money” or bribes,cheating,sinful ways of business and others as long we get extra money in our pockets or wallets!

Savings are the best habits we must promote to our Gen Z and Gen Y so that when they grow older the habits of savings become better and they dont like borrowings or taking a loan where they must pay all the principal borrrowed with interests as a result of the RIBA’ SYSTEM.

Unless You become a PIOUS person then money is not that all important BUT as a means of living pleasantly,free from riba’ and do not borrow and live within your limits or capability.

For those who earned so much ie. RM 1 Million or over a month then maybe PHILANTROPHY can become your practise or way of life where YOU can help and care for people in need and seek financial assistance.Can YOU or Will You?