Posts Tagged ‘gold’

Medium of exchange
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Definition[edit]
Money is the generally accepted medium of exchange and its most important and essential function is that it is a ‘measure of value’…[1][2] Hifzur Rab has shown that the market measures or sets the real value of various goods and services using the medium of exchange/money as unit of measure i.e., standard or the yard stick of measurement of wealth. There is no other alternative to the mechanism used by the market to set, determine, or measure the value of various goods and services. Just determination of prices is an essential condition for justice in exchange, efficient allocation of resources, economic growth welfare and justice.Money helps us in gaining power of buying. Thus, this is the most important and essential function of money. To be widely acceptable, a medium of exchange should have a relatively stable purchasing power (real value) and therefore it should possess the following characteristics:

Value common assets
Constant utility
Low cost of preservation
Transportability
Divisibility
High market value in relation to volume and weight
Recognisability
Resistance to counterfeiting

To serve as a measure of value, a medium of exchange, be it a good or signal, needs to have constant inherent value of its own or it must be firmly linked to a definite basket of goods and services. It should have constant intrinsic value and stable purchasing power. Gold was long popular as a medium of exchange and store of value because it was inert, was convenient to move due to even small amounts of gold having considerable value, had a constant value due to its special physical and chemical properties, and was cherished by men.

Critics of the prevailing system of fiat money argue that fiat money is the root cause of the continuum of economic crises, since it leads to the dominance of fraud, corruption, and manipulation precisely because it does not satisfy the criteria for a medium of exchange cited above. Specifically, prevailing fiat money is free float and depending upon its supply market finds or sets a value to it that continues to change as the supply of money is changed with respect to the economy’s demand. Increasing free floating money supply with respect to needs of the economy reduces the quantity of the basket of the goods and services to which it is linked by the market and that provides it purchasing power. Thus it is not a unit or standard measure of wealth and its manipulation impedes the market mechanism by that it sets/determine just prices. That leads us to a situation where no value-related economic data is just or reliable.[3][4] On the other hand, Chartalists claim that the ability to manipulate the value of fiat money is an advantage, in that fiscal stimulus is more easily available in times of economic crisis.

Requisites needed[edit]
Although the unit of account must be in some way related to the medium of exchange in use, e.g. coinage should be in denominations of that unit making accounting much easier to perform, it has often been the case that media of exchange have no natural relationship to that unit, and must be ‘minted’ or in some way marked as having that value. Also there may be variances in quality of the underlying good which may not have fully agreed commodity grading. The difference between the two functions becomes obvious when one considers the fact that coins were very often ‘shaved’, precious metal removed from them, leaving them still useful as an identifiable coin in the marketplace, for a certain number of units in trade, but which no longer had the quantity of metal supplied by the coin’s minter. It was observed as early as Oresme, Copernicus and then in 1558 by Sir Thomas Gresham, that bad money drives out good in any marketplace (Gresham’s Law states “Where legal tender laws exist, bad money drives out good money”). A more precise definition is this: “A currency that is artificially overvalued by law will drive out of circulation a currency that is artificially undervalued by that law.” Gresham’s law is therefore a specific application of the general law of price controls. A common explanation is that people will always keep the less adultered, less clipped, sweated, less filed, less trimmed coin, and offer the other in the marketplace for the full units for which it is marked. It is inevitably the bad coins proffered, good ones retained.

The fact that a bank or mint has always been able to generate a medium of exchange marked for more units than it is worth as a store of value, is the basis of banking.[dubious – discuss] Central banking is based on the principle that no medium needs more than the guarantee of the state that it can be redeemed for payment of debt as “legal tender” – thus, all money equally backed by the state is good money, within that state.[dubious – discuss] As long as that state produces anything of value to others, its medium of exchange has some value, and its currency may also be useful as a standard of deferred payment among others, even those who never deal with that state directly in foreign exchange.

Of all functions of money, the medium of exchange function has historically been the most problematic because of counterfeiting, the systematic and deliberate creation of bad money with no authorization to do so, leading to the driving out of the good money entirely.

Other functions rely not on recognition of some token or weight of metal in a marketplace, where time to detect any counterfeit is limited and benefits for successful passing-off are high, but on more stable long term social contracts: one cannot easily force a whole society to accept a different standard of deferred payment, require even small groups of people to uphold a floor price for a store of value, still less to re-price everything and rewrite all accounts to a unit of account (the most stable function). Thus it tends to be the medium of exchange function that constrains what can be used as a form of financial capital.

It was once common in the United States to widely accept a check (cheque) as a medium of exchange, several parties endorsing it perhaps multiple times before it would eventually be deposited for its value in units of account, and thus redeemed. This practice became less common as it was exploited by forgers and led to a domino effect of bounced checks – a forerunner of the kind of fragility that electronic systems would eventually bring.

In the age of electronic money it was, and remains, common to use very long strings of difficult-to-reproduce numbers, generated by encryption methods, to authenticate transactions and commitments as having come from trusted parties. Thus the medium of exchange function has become wholly a part of the marketplace and its signals, and is utterly integrated with the unit of account function, so that, given the integrity of the public key system on which these are based, they become to that degree inseparable. This has clear advantages – counterfeiting is difficult or impossible unless the whole system is compromised, say by a new factoring algorithm. But at that point, the entire system is broken and the whole infrastructure is obsolete – new keys must be re-generated and the new system will also depend on some assumptions about difficulty of factoring.

Due to this inherent fragility, which is even more profound with electronic voting, some economists argue that units of account should not ever be abstracted or confused with the nominal units or tokens used in exchange. A medium is just that, a medium, and should not be confused for the message.[dubious – discuss]

Officially reported gold holdings[edit]

 

Gold reserves per capita

 

World Gold Reserves from 1845 to 2013, in metric tons

The International Monetary Fund regularly maintains statistics of national assets as reported by various countries.[9] These data are used by the World Gold Council to periodically rank and report the gold holdings of countries and official organizations.

The gold listed for each of the countries in the table may not be physically stored in the country listed, as central banks generally have not allowed independent audits of their reserves.

As at June 2013 (Top 40 based on World Gold Council data)[10]

Rank

Country/Organization

Gold
(tonnes)

Gold’s share
of national
forex reserves
 (%)

G6 (EU)

8,972.6

76%

1  United States

8,133.5

70%

2  Germany

3,390.6

66%

3  International Monetary Fund

2,814.0

N.A.

4  Italy

2,451.8

65%

5  France

2,435.4

65%

6  China

1,054.1

1%

7   Switzerland

1,040.1

8%

8  Russia

1,015.4[11]

9  Japan

765.2

2%

10  Netherlands

612.5

52%

11  India

557.7

7%

12  European Central Bank

502.1

27%

13  Turkey

487.3[12]

16.2%

14  Taiwan

423.6

4%

15  Portugal

382.5

84.0%

16  Venezuela

365.8

66.0%

17  Saudi Arabia

322.9

2%

18  United Kingdom

310.3

12%

19  Lebanon

286.8

22%

20  Spain

281.6

23%

21  Austria

280.0

48%

22  Belgium

227.4

33%

23  Philippines

192.7

9%

24  Algeria

173.6

3%

25  Thailand

152.4

3%

26  Kazakhstan

130.9

19%

27  Singapore

127.4

2%

28  Sweden

125.7

7%

29  South Africa

125.1

10%

30  Mexico

124.9

3%

31  Libya

116.6

4%

32  Bank for International Settlements

115.0

N.A.

33  Greece

112.0

76%

34  South Korea

104.4

1%

35  Romania

103.7

9%

36  Poland

102.9

4%

37  Australia

79.9

6%

38  Kuwait

79.0

9%

39  Indonesia

75.9

3%

40  Egypt

75.6

21%

41  Federative Republic of Brazil

67.0

1.0%

42  Kingdom of Denmark

66.5

3.5%

43  Islamic Republic of Pakistan

64.4

27.4%

44  Argentine Republic

61.7

7.2%

45  Republic of Belarus

49.4

24.5%

46  Republic of Finland

49.1

21.3%

47  Plurinational State of Bolivia

42.3

13.6%

48  Republic of Bulgaria

40.0

9.3%

49 West African Economic and Monetary Union

36.5

12.0%

50  Malaysia

36.4

1.2%

51  Ukraine

36.4

6.7%

52  Republic of Peru

34.7

2.3%

53  Slovakia

31.8

64.7%

54  Nepal

30.1

22.9%

55  Republic of Iraq

29.8

2.0%

56  Republic of Ecuador

26.3

28.1%

57  Syrian Arab Republic

25.8

6.5%

58  Kingdom of Morocco

22.0

5.7%

59  Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

21.9

13.8%

60  Federal Republic of Nigeria

21.4

2.0%

61  Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

16.6

11.2%

62  Republic of Serbia

16.6

4.8%

63  Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

14.2

5.5%

64  Republic of Cyprus

13.9

65.8%

65  People’s Republic of Bangladesh

13.5

4.2%

66  Kingdom of Cambodia

12.4

11.1%

67  State of Qatar

12.4

1.4%

68  Czech Republic

11.0

1.1%

69  Republic of Colombia

10.4

1.2%

70  Lao People’s Democratic Republic

8.9

34.4%

71  Republic of Ghana

8.7

7.1%

72  Republic of Paraguay

8.7

6.2%

73  Republic of Latvia

7.7

4.6%

74  Republic of the Union of Myanmar

7.3

4.4%

75  Republic of El Salvador

7.3

10.6%

76  Republic of Guatemala

6.9

4.3%

77  Republic of Macedonia

6.8

11.1%

78  Tunisian Republic

6.7

4.4%

79  Republic of Tajikistan

6.4

51.1%

80  Republic of Azerbaijan

6.0

2.0%

81  Ireland

6.0

16.6%

82  Republic of Lithuania

5.8

3.5%

83  Mongolia

5.8

7.4%

84  Kingdom of Bahrain

4.7

3.7%

85  Nation of Brunei, the Abode of Peace

4.0

4.9%

86  Republic of Mauritius

3.9

5.2%

87  Republic of Mozambique

3.7

6.6%

88  Kyrgyz Republic

3.3

7.1%

89  Canada

3.2

0.2%

90  Republic of Slovenia

3.2

18.5%

91  Aruba

3.1

18.5%

92  Hungary

3.1

0.3%

93  Bosnia and Herzegovina

3.0

3.1%

94  Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

2.2

10.7%

95  Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

2.1

0.0%

96  Republic of Iceland

2.0

2.2%

97  Independent State of Papua New Guinea

2.0

2.3%

98  Republic of Trinidad and Tobago

1.9

0.9%

99  Republic of Albania

1.6

2.8%

100  Republic of Yemen

1.6

1.2%

Sum

31,868.8

Privately held gold[edit]

As of October 2009, gold exchange-traded funds held 1,750 tonnes of gold for private and institutional investors.[13]

Privately held gold (May 2011)[14]

Rank

Name

Type

Gold (Tonnes)

1

SPDR Gold Shares

ETF

1,239

2

ETF Securities Gold Funds

ETF

259.79

3

ZKB Physical Gold

ETF

195.53

4

COMEX Gold Trust

ETF

137.61

5

Julius Baer Physical Gold Fund

ETF

93.50

6

Central Fund of Canada

CEF

52.71[15]

7

NewGold ETF

ETF

47.75

8

Sprott Physical Gold Trust

CEF

32.27

9

ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares

ETF

27.97

10

Bullionvault

Bailment

37.1[16]

11

Central GoldTrust

CEF

18.81[17]

12

GoldMoney

Bailment

19.55[18]

World gold holdings[edit]

World gold holdings (2008) (Source: World Gold Council)[19]

Holding

Percentage

Jewellery 52%
Central banks 18%
Investment (bars, coins) 16%
Industrial 12%
Unaccounted 2%

 

List of wealthiest historical figures

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The list of the wealthiest historical figures is an attempt to gather and compare the net worths and fortunes of historical figures against one another. Inflation and other factors devalue currency over time and economies of different regions and time periods valued goods and other commodities at different prices, making it difficult to accurately compare fortunes from different decades, centuries and especially millennia. Also, because several individuals and families never had their financial records revealed publicly, nor had any contemporary estimates of their worth, several persons may be noticeably missing from the list due to a lack of written accounts of their wealth. Some of the wealth estimated includes stock in companies, the value of which is always changing.

This list includes both nominal and real wealth. The nominal value of a person’s net worth reflects the price in that person’s time, without adjustments for inflation or other factors. The realvalue of a person’s net worth reflects an attempt to adjust a fortune’s worth against economic factors that usually devalue a currency, and thus reflect the buying power of that wealth as a stable figure comparable across historical periods.

Historical figures and their wealth

Historical figures often attested to be of great riches, presented in alphabetical order.

Alan Rufus

A companion of William the Conqueror during the Norman invasion of Britain, Alan Rufus, who is also known as Alain le Roux or Alan the Red, received some 250,000 acres (1,000 km2) in land grants as a reward for his allegiance. His property stretched throughout Yorkshire, Norfolk, Suffolk, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire and London, totaling some £11,000 by the time of his death in 1093. This would make Alan Rufus the wealthiest Briton in all the history of the British Isles. His fortune was estimated to be equivalent to £81.33 billion, or roughly US$162.74 billion, in 2007.[1]

Mir Osman Ali Khan

Of the seven Nizams who governed Hyderabad StateIndia from 1720 to 1948, the richest was the last, Mir Osman Ali Khan, who was regarded as the wealthiest man on earth – his portrait graced the cover of Time magazine. As recently as 2008 he was rated fifth highest on the Forbes All-Time Wealthiest List (Bill Gates ranks 20th). He had his own mint, printing his own currency, the Hyderabadi rupee, and a vast private treasury. Its coffers were said to contain £100m in gold and silver bullion, and a further £400m of jewels. Among them was the fabulously rare Jacob Diamond, valued at some £60m today, and used by the Nizam as a paperweight. There were pearls, too – enough to pave Piccadilly – hundreds of race horses, thousands of uniforms, tonnes of royal regalia and Rolls-Royces by the dozen.[2]

De’ Medici

The de’ Medici family of Florence is one of the most illustrious noble families in European history, and were the hereditary holders of the titles of Grand Duke of Tuscany, Duke of Florence and Duke of Urbino, and married into still more. Other family members held singularly prominent positions, namely Pope Clement VIIPope Leo XIppolito Cardinale de’ Medici, Catherine de Medici, Queen of France, wife of Henri II- who had an equally famous mistress in Diane de Poitiers (who was distantly related to Catherine) and Marie de’ Medici, Queen of France and of Navarre.

Giovanni di Bicci de’ Medici founded the family’s bank and supported the return of the papacy to Rome, which occurred in 1410. He was rewarded for his efforts with the position of personal banker to the papacy, several tax contracts and alum mines, all of which firmly established both the family’s fortune and political influence. His son Cosimo would expand the bank, allowing the family fortune to grow to 122,669 Florin by 1457. Cosimo’s influence had become so great that he acted as de facto ruler of Florence despite holding no elected office. However by 1481, city tax records show that the family fortune had plummeted to 57,930 Florin under the direction of Lorenzo, who made for a better politician and diplomat than banker.[3]

Jacob Fugger

Jacob Fugger (German: Jakob Fugger) (6 March 1459 – 30 December 1525), sometimes known as Jacob Fugger the Rich, was a German banker and a member of the Fugger banking family of Germany. His nephew was the wealthy banker, Anton Fugger to whom he bequeathed his wealth upon his death.

Marcus Licinius Crassus

Marcus Licinius Crassus is held to be the wealthiest man in Roman history as he had a personal net worth equal to the treasury of Rome.[4] When Crassus was killed in Syria, he was beheaded and molten gold was poured into his mouth to quench his insatiable greed.

One of the leading politicians of Rome in his day, Marcus Licinius Crassus, along with Gaius Julius Caesar and Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, comprised the First Triumvirate. Crassus, born into a wealthy political family, inherited a fortune of 7 million sesterces after the death of his father in 87 BC. Political rivalries eventually led to the state seizing Crassus’s wealth. After several years of exile, Lucius Cornelius Sulla regained a position of power in Rome, and Crassus as a loyal and valued supporter found himself in charge of Sulla’s proscriptions. In such a position, Crassus was able to rebuild his family fortune by seizing the property of executed criminals for himself, and there is evidence that shows Crassus sometimes executed innocent individuals simply to obtain their vast estates and wealth.[4]

Crassus also expanded his wealth by trading in slaves and by purchasing whole neighborhoods of Rome as they burned at drastically below market value. At the time, Rome had no formal way of battling fires and they usually were left to burn themselves out, which meant several estates and fortunes were lost in the process. Crassus employed a firefighting brigade of some five hundred men and, after he negotiated the purchase of the burning building and the surrounding estates in danger, the brigade would collapse the home that was ablaze to extinguish the fire before it could spread.

Crassus was known in Rome as Dives, meaning “The Rich” or “Moneybags”. Plutarch describes how Crassus’s relationship with a Vestal Virgin came into question at one point, for which the punishment was death. Crassus was acquitted after claiming that he merely courted the woman in an attempt to acquire her villa at below market cost and that carnal lusts never came to mind. Wishing to gain both political and military fame during the slave uprisings led by Spartacus, Crassus offered to equip, train, and lead two new legions of soldiers into battle at his own expense in an impressive show of personal wealth. In 53 BC, while again attempting military fame, Crassus was killed during a parley with a Parthian general; Lucius Cassius Dio tells that he thereupon had molten gold poured into his mouth to satiate his unyielding thirst for wealth.

It is believed that Crassus expanded his personal fortune to a remarkable 170 million sesterces, while Pliny the Elder surmised his fortune to be valued even higher, at 200 million sesterces. This would place Crassus’s net worth equal to the total annual budget of the Roman treasury. He has been considered the wealthiest man in history,[4] though this claim has been disputed.[5]

Musa I

A depiction of Mansa Musa holding a gold nugget, from the Catalan Atlas.

Musa I, Mansa of Mali, more commonly referred to simply as Mansa Musa, ascended to the throne of the wealthy Mali Empire in 1312. The emperors were fairly obscure figures outside of Western Africa, but Musa’s religious Hajj in 1324 would bring great attention to the wealth and extravagance of his lands. The retinue that Musa traveled with included 60,000 men, in addition to 12,000 slaves, 500 of which marched before the mansa dressed in silken robes and golden staffs. There were 80 camels in the train that are said to have carried anywhere from 50 to 300 pounds each of gold dust. This entire entourage could be evaluated in terms of today, more than US$400 billion. Musa spent so much gold, particularly in Egypt, that the price of the rare metal was devalued and caused the economy of that nation to be devastated for years. Mansa Musa was reportedly quite pious and very generous to the common people upon his Hajj, such that the citizens of Cairo, Mecca and Baghdad told tales of his visit for generations.[6][7]

Nikolai Alexandrovich Romanov

Tsar Nicholas II of Russia, born in 1868 as Nikolai Alexandrovich into the House of Romanov, was the emperor of the Russian Empire from 1894 until the February Revolution of 1917. Around age 48 (in 1916) his wealth was valued at up to US$ 881 million, which equals US$290.7 billion in today’s money. He is seen as the wealthiest monarch and head of state in history and further as the wealthiest saint as the Russian Orthodox Church declared him, his wife and his children martyrs after being murdered in 1918 by the Bolsheviks.

Rothschilds

The wealth of the Rothschild family at its height during the mid-19th century has been estimated in today’s terms in the hundreds of billions, or even in the trillions, of dollars.[8][8][9][10]

Somozas

 

Anastasio Somoza Debayleand his wife Hope Portocarrerostrolling on grounds of their home.

The wealth of the Somoza family (the political dynasty who ruled Nicaragua), was the largest in Latin America for decades. According to the Cuban magazine: Bohemia, Anastasio Somoza García was on the top ten World’s Richest Men before 1956.

His assets are said to have included 55 percent of the nation’s arable land, 51 cattle ranches, 46 coffee plantations, extensive real estate in Managua, including luxury villas in United States and The Bahamas, and interests in various business ventures. By the time of his assassination, the senior Somoza’s wealth was an estimated $400 million. The Somoza fortune grew as other family members succeeded each other in power. In 1978, their wealth was calculated at some $1 billion to $5 billion.

Anastasio Somoza Debayle contributed a million dollars to the Nixon campaign in 1972, according to a Central America foreign minister who traveled to Washington, DC with Somoza’s mother; Salvadora DeBayle de Somoza. She had asked the minister what his country was contributing to the campaign. When the foreign minister said “nothing”, Salvadora rebuked him “You people are so hopeless, we are giving a million and, as head of the family, I’m taking it up to him”.

Legendary wealth

As records are lost and fortunes often never fully tallied, sometimes only vague stories and grandiose legends are left as witnesses to the treasures held by individuals past. These tales are often believed to be fanciful or exaggerated, and some have even been discredited with new discoveries and evidence. Nevertheless, the fortunes were surely impressive to have remained in the popular conscious through the ages, even if only as legend.

Croesus

Croesus was a king of Lydia in the sixth century BC. His name in Greek and Persian cultures became a synonym for a wealthy man. In English, expressions such as “rich as Croesus” or “richer than Croesus” are used to indicate great wealth. Croesus himself is often credited with the invention of the first formalized currency systems and coinage.

Mausolus

The wealth that was for a long time attributed to Mausolus was more romantic legend than fact. The misconception of his wealth centred around the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus, a great tomb constructed by the king for himself and his wife that was considered a “Wonder of the World” by Greek historians and writers. It survived into the fifteenth century until it was finally destroyed by earthquakes. Afterward, the carved stones and sculptures strewn across the landscape caused writers of the Renaissance to tell tales of the wealth of a king who could afford such beautiful artistry in such great numbers. Much of the remains of the tomb were either plundered for their sculpture or used as an artificial quarry from which castles and fortifications were built over the succeeding centuries.

Yet, discoveries during excavations of the region show that the tomb’s construction either directly bankrupted the treasury, or indirectly lead to the downfall of the kingdom, as high taxation and strain on resources led to political instability, which eventually emboldened neighboring states to invade the weakened kingdom. Many of the artisans and craftsman that were initially hired to construct the tomb continued to work without pay after the kingdom had been bankrupted, working solely for the glory and renown of their efforts.

American entrepreneurs

American entrepreneurs have often amassed the largest nominal fortunes in history. However, due to the effect of inflation, many of these fortunes have actually accumulated smaller real value than some historical figures.

John D. Rockefeller

 

Rockefeller depicted as an emperor of oil and railroad in a contemporary satirical cartoon.

On 29 September 1916, John D. Rockefeller became the first man to ever reach a nominal personal fortune of US$1 billion. Rockefeller amassed his fortune from the Standard Oil company, of which he was a founder, chairman and major shareholder. By the time of his death in 1937, estimates place his net worth in the range of US$392 billion to US$663.4 billion in adjusted dollars for the late 2000s, and it is estimated that his personal fortune was equal to 1.53% of the total U.S. economy in his day. When considering the real value of his wealth, Rockefeller is widely held to be the wealthiest American in the history of the United States.[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]

Cornelius Vanderbilt

Cornelius Vanderbilt gained his fortune from shipping and railroad. His net worth of US$105 million in 1877 was equal to 1.15% of the U.S. economy in his day. With a real value estimated somewhere between US$143 billion and US$178.4 billion adjusted for the late 2000s, Vanderbilt is the second wealthiest American in the history of the country.[12][13][18]

Henry Ford

Henry Ford was an American automotive engineer, entrepreneur, and founder of the Ford Motor Company. Through his designing of the Model T Fordand the assembly line means of rapid production, he was able to lower the base price of his product in order to be reach a wider market. His highest earnings are recorded at age 57 and he died at the age of 83 in 1947 at a net worth of US$188.1 billion (Inflated value in 2008)

Andrew Carnegie

Andrew Carnegie was born in Dunfermline, Scotland before emigrating to the US. Founder of the Carnegie Steel Company, which was the most extensive integrated iron and steel operations in the United States, Carnegie merged his company into U.S. Steel and sold his share for US$492 million in 1901. Capitalized at US$1.4 billion at the time, U.S. Steel was the first billion dollar company in the world. In his final years, Carnegie’s net worth was US$475 million, but by the time of his death in 1919 he had donated most of his wealth to charities and other philanthropic endeavors and had only US$30 million left to his personal fortune. Carnegie’s hundreds of millions accounted for about 0.60% of the U.S. economy and has a real value estimated at anywhere from US$75 billion to US$297.8 billion adjusted for the late 2000s.[11][12][13][18]

John Jacob Astor

After immigrating to the United States, John Jacob Astor began trading in furs and later in real estate and opium. By 1800 his nominal wealth was some US$250,000, and by the time of his death in 1848 his fortune had grown to US$20 million. Equal to 0.93% of the national GDP, Astor has a real wealth estimated at some US$116 billion when adjusted for the late 2000s.[11][12][13][18]

Bill Gates

Bill Gates has singularly amassed the largest nominal fortune in all of history through his computer technology corporation Microsoft, peaking at US$101 billion in 1999.[5] By 2007, his net worth had dropped to US$82 billion, and by 2011 his worth was valued at US$56 billion. Gates donates the majority of his wealth to charity. In terms of real value, Gates is likely one of the ten wealthiest Americans in history.[11] He has been placed in the top 10 wealthiest people of all time.[5]

Companies all try to become a Good Company to a Better or Greater Company by improving their products,services and most important of all their people’s talents.

However in Malaysia,we have many former and current Top Govt Leaders,Business Owners and Organised Crime Bosses who are always being written about their ill gotten wealth and status as one of the richest people on earth?Is Malaysia so rich to make so many people one of the richest in the world?Where the money comes from?Is it their own effort or from their own sweat and brains or is it from the wealth of the nation and Rakyat?Are these stories written about them true or just false news and facts?

In USA,The President can be in power for 2 successive terms (about 8 years) and after that if they are good or great they cannot be in power anymore.Thats in the US Constitution BUT in Malaysia there is no such thing!You can be PM for the normal 1 term of 4 years or even 24 years if you can have your way/s!So,is it good or bad thing for Malaysia to have a PM serving for more than 6 terms or even 3 or above terms?If you asked the new Generations of GenZ,Gen Y or even Gen X they will surely say its Bad or No Good,why?To them nothing is actually long term just like a computer software or electronic gadget!they get updated or revised very often maybe in 3 months or 6 months duration!So,Change is a Way of Life and is Normal!

Like the story of Karun and Firaun in the Holy Quran which stated how they amassed tons of golds like mountains and wealth of undue proportions,they all finally got the wrath from Allah SWT for behaving like God and finally being punished to the greatest extreme by Allah SWT who dislikes any of HIS subjects to behave so arrogantly and not abiding and worship Allah SWT Powers and Orders!Funny, we have still Malaysians who want to behave like Firaun or Karun and maybe their punishments are coming soon or specially prepared for them when they go to the Alam Barzakh not yet Alam Akhirat!Beware all who amassed great amount of wealth that actually they cannot consumed and eat through their lives on earth!All Haram Acts especially by Muslims will be punished to the greatest extreme by Allah SWT unless they seek for immediate mercy from Allah SWT before their death or sudden demised.Inshallah.

Let’s fear Allah SWT for all haram acts and wealth that are acquired by  haram ways or ways that are forbidden in Islam and Rule of Laws of Governments.

The World is Enough for People in Need BUT Not Enough For People in Greed!

Wassallam.

Ramli

YES,Ramli is now walking the talk by actively participating in this new era of Mobile and Internet based businesses!

First this business: http://www.1malaysiasms.com

What you must do initially?

step1: SMS

1M REG 60192537165 (your full name)…send to 36553

(you need to send this initial text to get your ID and Password before u can log in to 1malaysiasms.com.there will be a 50 sen fee for this sms)

once rcvd reply follow step 2

step2:ON 1MACC

ON 1MACC ..send to 36553..(this step will confirm you as a Partner and you can log in to 1malaysiasms.com…and enjoy all the privileges as a Partner…we are still at the pre launch stage…only on 5thApril,2010 is the Official Launch date)

ONCE DONE,YOU are now a FREE Partner of 1malaysiasms.com

Note:

as of today,this project will be most benefitting the GOLD and DIAMOND Partners…read all the infos on the 1malaysiasms.com

Ramli is now a GOLD Partner,take note…and join only 4 days ago…from a Free..to upgrade IRON..and ..upgrade GOLD…soon Diamond!

any enquiries,contact Ramli at 019-2537165

Ramli Abu Hassan -Principal Consultant for DPS,promotes World Class Performance (WCP) in Malaysia and ASEAN since 2005.The WCP Approach that Ramli conducts via Training/Workshops and Consulting services are basically based on Professor David Drennan TOM’s Approach (Team Objective Meeting Approach).Prof.Drennan also wrote a book in 1999 titled “The 12 Ladders to World Class Performance”

Later in 2007,Ramli in collaboration with Mr.Kevin Wheeler-President of Global Learning Resources Inc USA started to promote the establishment of Corporate University -your in house U for your own company like Disney Institute,Motorola U,Intel U,Lafarge U,Dell Academy and many others…

All these initiatives by Ramli and his Business Partners ie.Prof.Drennan from UK and Kevin Wheeler from USA is to help your company achieve the World Class levels where you are now among the best performers in the world as far as your company operational areas like Customer Focus,Teamwork,Elimination of Wastes,Rewards and Recoqnition,Managing for Quality,Visible Measurement Systems,Aligning Management Objectives,Organizing the Workplace,Best Operating Practices & Continuous Improvement,Staff Empowerment and Involvement,Purposeful Communication and Continuous Learning.These 12 Ladders as Prof.Drennan reiterated makes your company move from Level 1 (ordinary performance) to Level 5 (world class performance)Of course it is a step by step process although all the innovative approaches and creative minds can produce the Big Results Fast.This workshops and consultancy support to your company on this World Class Journey is possible where ordinary people like what your company possess now can produce extra ordinary results within a stipulated time frame as well as the commitment and passion to move up the Levels to World Class Performance.Transforming a Company or worst still making a Turnaround for the company from loss making to profit making is never an easy job by any CEO or his Top Mgmt Team but having a plan and working the plan closely will enable you to gain success and reap the harvest of a good job done.Inshallah.

Please do invite Ramli and his DPS Team to seek to first understand your requirements and then to propose whats best for you to make a Turnaround or Transform YOUR Business to World Class Levels….

Please call Ramli at hp:+6-019-2537165 or email: ramlipromoter@yahoo.com

Ramli’s  International Experts on World Class Performance and Talent Management are also available for any projects deemed necessary by YOUR Company concerned.Just inform  Ramli your needs as soon as possible (asap)

Here is a good article about the Great Talents developed at Malaysia’s Danaharta organisation:

Saturday October 10, 2009

Talent rollout from Danaharta

By ERROL OH

THE final report of Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Bhd, covering 1998 to 2005, contains a lot of familiar corporate names. Many of those who had served in the management have gone on to bigger and better things.

For example, the three managing directors, Datuk Azman Yahya, Datuk Seri Abdul Hamidy Abdul Hafiz and Datuk Zukri Samat, are heads of Symphony House Bhd, Danajamin Nasional Bhd and Bank Islam Malaysia Bhd respectively.

Because Azman has come from the Amanah Capital group, it is only natural that he brought over some of his former colleagues to Danaharta.

Others on the roll of honour included Datuk Mohd Bakke Salleh (Felda Holdings Bhd MD), Datuk Ismee Ismail (Lembaga Tabung Haji CEO), Eric Chan Kok Leong (Eastern & Oriental Bhd executive director), Abdul Rahman Ahmad (Ekuiti Nasional Bhd CEO), Shahril Ridza Ridzuan (Malaysian Resources Corp Bhd MD), Ahmad Zulqarnain Onn (Danajamin CEO), Ee Kok Sin (Affin Bank Bhd chief financial officer), Fazlur Rahman Ebrahim (MD of Prokhas Sdn Bhd, somewhat the successor to Danaharta) and Datuk Kris Azman Abdullah, who was until recently an executive director of the Securities Commission.

Clearly, Danaharta had some serious talent in its seven years of existence.

Says Azman of Symphony House, Danaharta’s first MD, “We had to start the organisation by getting in people who already had good experience because of the intensity of the whole programme. So we couldn’t afford to really train people.

“We did take in some young people. At the time, people like Rahman, Shahril and Zul (Ahmad Zulqarnain Onn) were quite young, brilliant guys and all that. But the initial core team comprised those with good experience.”

Because Azman had come from the Amanah Capital group, it was only natural that he brought over some of his former colleagues to Danaharta.

“I needed to get Danaharta up and running within three months. So the easiest way is to tap some of the resources within Amanah. Even if I were to get people from outside, going through the interview process and serving the notice period would take too long,” he recalls.

“So I sought the permission of the chairman then to get the core team from Amanah to help me out. And he agreed because Danaharta was an entity of national importance.”

As asset management company set up in June 1998 by the Government during the Asian financial crisis, Danaharta was meant to thwart the then imminent disaster of the rising level of non-performing loans (NPLs) in the domestic banking system.

The company’s twin objectives were relief the financial institutions of the burden of managing NPLs, and to maximise recovery value of the NPLs in its portfolio. At the same time, Danaharta injected funds into the financial institutions.

It was a mission that attracted a lot of professionals who wanted a fresh challenge.

Says a former Danaharta executive, who is now a department head at a government-linked company, “I joined because it was exciting. This was an opportunity that will not come up again. You got to test yourself. There was partly the national duty angle as well, and my service there is a feather in the cap.”

Wong Muh Rong was doing corporate finance at an investment bank when she decided that Danaharta was where she wanted to be instead.

“It was the recession and there few deals to work on. I was very bored and was reading newspapers in the office for hours,” she says. “Danaharta wanted people with five to six years’ experience and I didn’t have that.”

Her father, Tan Sri Wong See Wah, the former Deputy Finance Minister, offered to arrange for an interview with Azman but told her that it was entirely up to her to secure the job. And she did, ending up in the corporate finance unit.

“I’m very proud to be a member of the Danaharta alumni. It was a very good training ground and I am where am today because of that,” says Wong, who is managing director of Astramina Advisory Sdn Bhd, her own outfit.

When asked about the characteristics of the Danaharta alumni that will make them effective CEOs, Azman says, “The ability to work under pressure is definitely one. A lot of people can put in the hours, but the ability to put in effective hours is very important, to be able to prioritise what needs to be done.

“I’m pretty happy that generally the team at Danaharta are honest. Integrity is very important. They know the importance of our mission. They had to get it done and they got it done. They work as a team. I don’t encourage office politicking. Basically, I try to get everybody to work as a team. That’s really critical.”

Indeed, it was a demanding environment. Says the former executive, “We had to think on our feet. We were always put to the test. We had to be the MacGyver of the day. We were given a penknife and we had to dismantle a lorry.”

Wong says one of Danaharta’s more notable achievements was to figure out how to calculate listing premiums when working out deals with white knights of listed companies. “We had to come up with something out of nothing,” she adds.